Basic HTML Version
Jamieson, G. A., & Sheehan, P. W. (2002). A critical evaluation of the relationship
between sustained attentional abilities and hypnotic susceptibility.
Contemporary
Hypnosis
,
19
, 62–75.
Kaiser, J., Barker, R., Haenschel, C., Baldeweg, T., & Gruzelier, J. H. (1997). Hypnosis
and event-related potential correlates of error processing in a Stroop-type
paradigm: A test of the frontal hypothesis.
International Journal of Psychophysiology
,
27
, 215–222.
Kirsch, I., & Lynn, S. J. (1998). Dissociation theories of hypnosis.
Psychological Bulletin
,
123
, 100–115.
MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the
role of dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive
control.
Science
,
288
, 1835–1838.
MacLeod, C. M., & MacDonald, P. A. (2000). Interdimensional interference in the Stroop
effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention.
Trends in Cognitive
Sciences
,
4
, 383–391.
Milham, M. P., Banich, M. T., Webb, A., Barad, V., Cohen, N. J., Wszalek, T., & Kramer,
A. F. (2001). The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in
attentional control depends on the nature of the conflict.
Cognitive Brain Research
,
12
,
467–473
.
Milham, M. P., Banich, M. T., Claus, E. D., & Cohen, N. J. (2003). Practice-related effects
demonstrate complementary roles of anterior cingulated and prefrontal cortices in
attentional control.
Neuroimaging
,
18
, 483–493.
Nordby, H., Hugdhal, K., Jasiukaitis, P., & Spiegel, D. (1999). Effects of hypnotizability
on performance of a Stroop task and event-related potentials.
Perceptual and Motor
Skills
,
88
, 819–830.
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of
behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.),
Consciousness and
self-regulation
(Vol. 4). New York: Plenum Press.
Sheehan, P. W., Donovan, P. B., & MacLeod, C. M. (1988). Strategy manipulation and the
Stroop effect in hypnosis.
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
,
97
, 455–460.
Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962).
The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.
Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Stroop, J. (1935). Studies of interference in verbal reactions.
Journal of Experimental
Psychology
,
18
, 643–661.
Stuss, D. T., Shallice, T., Alexander, M. P., & Picton, T. W. (1995). A multidisciplinary
approach to anterior attentional functions.
Annals of the NewYork Academy of Sciences
,
769
,
191–211
.
Tellegen, A. (1981). Practicing the two disciplines for relaxation and enlightenment:
Comment on ‘‘Role of the feedback signal in electromyograph biofeedback: The
relevance of attention’’ by Qualls and Sheehan.
Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General
,
110
, 217–226.
Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences:
Absorption, a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility.
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
,
83
, 268–277.
Van Zomeren, A. H., & Brouwer, W. H. (1994).
Clinical neuropsychology of attention.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962).
Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale
,
Form C.
Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Woody, E., & Bowers, K. (1994). A frontal assault on dissociated control. In S. J. Lynn & J. W.
Rhue (Eds.),
Dissociation: Clinical and theoretical perspectives
(pp. 52–79). New York:
Guilford.
Woody, E., & Farvolden, P. (1998). Dissociation in hypnosis and frontal executive
function.
American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis
,
40
, 206–215.
AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF DISSOCIATED CONTROL
247
Downloaded by [ ] at 05:16 26 March 2012