Page 16 - Мой проект1

Basic HTML Version

ROLE OF COGNITIVE EFFORT
387
that it purposely had little emotional content, thereby minimizing the
contribution of such emotional components.
In conclusion, the overall pattern of results of the present study,
combining heart-rate and subjective-rating data, seem to accord best
with a dissociated-control perspective on hypnosis and less well with
the dissociated-experience and social-cognitive approaches. In particu-
lar, the greater ability of high hypnotizable people to produce vivid
and absorbing imagery does not appear to depend on greater underly-
ing cognitive effort.
R
EFERENCES
Barber, T. X. (1999). Hypnosis: A mature view.
Contemporary Hypnosis, 16
, 123–127.
Bauer, R. M., & Craighead, W. E. (1979). Psychological responses to the imagination of
fearful and neutral situations: The effects of imagery instructions.
Behavior Therapy,
10
, 389–403.
Bowers, K. S. (1992). Imagination and dissociation in hypnotic responding.
International
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 40
, 253–275.
Bowers, K. S. (1993). The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) Scale of Hypnotic Suscep-
tibility: Normative and comparative data.
International Journal of Clinical and Experi-
mental Hypnosis, 41
, 35–46.
Bowers, K. S., & Davidson, T. M. (1991). A neodissociative critique of Spanos’s
social-psychological model of hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.),
Theories of hypnosis: Current models and perspectives
(pp. 105–143). New York:
Guilford.
Bowers, K. S., & Woody, E. Z. (1996). Hypnotic amnesia and the paradox of intentional
forgetting.
Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105
, 381–390.
Bowers, P. G. (1978). Hynotizability, creativity, and the role of effortless experiencing.
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 26
, 184–202.
Bowers, P. G. (1982). The classic suggestion effect: Relationships with scales of hypnotiz-
ability, effortless experiencing, and imagery vividness.
International Journal of Clinical
and Experimental Hypnosis, 30
, 270–279.
Carroll, D., Baker, J., & Preston, M. (1979). Individual differences in visual imagery and
the voluntary control of heart rate.
British Journal of Psychology, 70
, 39–49.
Carroll, D., Turner, J. R., & Hellawell, C. (1986). Heart rate and oxygen consumption dur-
ing active psychological challenge: The effects of level of difficulty.
Psychophysiology,
23
, 174–181.
Comey, G., & Kirsch, I. (1999). Intentional and spontaneous imagery in hypnosis: The
phenomenology of hypnotic responding.
International Journal of Clinical and Experi-
mental Hypnosis, 47
, 65–85.
Davidson, T. M., & Bowers, K. S. (1991). Selective hypnotic amnesia: Is it a successful
attempt to forget or an unsuccessful attempt to remember?
Journal of Abnormal Psy-
chology, 100
, 133–143.
Eastwood, J. D., Gaskovski, P., & Bowers, K. S. (1998). The folly of effort: Ironic effects in
the mental control of pain.
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis,
46
, 77–91.
Fairclough, S. H., & Venables, L. (2006). Prediction of subjective states from psychophys-
iology: A multivariate approach.
Biological Psychology, 71
, 100–110.
Ginsberg, S., Heslegrave, R. J., Scher, H. B., Wong, F. K., & Furedy, J. J. (1980). T-wave
and heart rate changes as a function of differing degrees of task difficulty.
Psycho-
physiology, 17
, 294.
Downloaded by [University of Macedonia] at 02:14 29 March 2012